Soul Of Remedies By Rajan Sankaran Pdf Creator

Rajan Sankaran is a internationally renowned practitioner, teacher, and theorist of homeopathy. Rajan Sankaran is the son of homeopath Dr.

He graduated from the Bombay (Mumbai) Homoeopathic Medical College in 1981. He remains on the staff of that institution, now known as Smt. Chandaben Mohanbhai Patel Homeopathic Medical College, as an Assistant Professor of repertory and Honorary Physician. Sankaran has published many books on homeopathy, including ‘The Spirit of Homoeopathy’, ‘The Substance of Homoeopathy’, ‘The Soul of Remedies’, ‘Provings’, ‘The System in Homoeopathy’, ‘An Insight into Plants (Vol 1, 2 & 3)’, ‘The Sensation in Homoeopathy’, including his recent writings ‘Sensation Refined’ and ‘Structure – Experiences with the Mineral Kingdom’ etc. Rajan Sankaran lives and practices in the Juhu area of Mumbai, India. Sankaran, welcome to the Hpathy Hot-Seat once again after eight years!

The Synergy In Homoeopathy An Integrated Approach to Case-Taking and Analysis Rajan Sankaran Mumbai, India. THE SOUL OF REMEDIES RAJAN SANKARAN. Reader's Materia Medica may be narrowed down to the limited number of remedies described here; it may create.

I was recently reading your new book The Synergy in Homeopathy and I found it really very interesting because of the more integrated and encompassing approach that you have shown in this work. Can you please share with our readers what this ‘synergy’ stands for?

RS: The contemporary approach in homoeopathy, termed Synergy, has evolved over the last thirty years and has come to be advantageous when utilized in homoeopathic practice and is overall a clinically successful method. While utilizing in-depth knowledge in fundamental and traditional tools of homoeopathy like the Materia Medica, Repertory, and the Organon, the Synergy method also values the newer approaches like Sensation, Kingdom, Miasm and Source understanding. ‘Synergy’ denotes the coming together of two or more things to create an effect that is much greater than the sum of the two.

In homoeopathic practice, using two or more different approaches in tandem produces the best results. The utilization of traditional homoeopathic tools such as materia medica and the repertory (left-brain concepts) in combination with more modern homeopathic approaches such as sensation and kingdom understandings (right-brain concepts) generates the most success in clinical practice. Crack Game Hay Day Android.

This idea, termed Synergy, has evolved over the last three decades and has come to a very effective position. This is a system that can be taught, practiced, and replicated successfully by students and practitioners. This method has brought together both the old and the new approaches in homoeopathy – it has established a universal platform where all approaches in homoeopathy are welcomed and used to aid in the patient’s recovery. This triangle figure represents the Synergy concept in homoeopathy: The peak of the triangle is the Genius. Genius here means the prevailing spirit or distinctive character of something – this applies to the patient and also to the remedy. As coined by Dr. In the foreword to Boger’s Synoptic Key he states – “ The strain which runs through every pathogenetic symptom complex has been called the genius of the drug.“ The first few lines about each remedy in Boger’s Synoptic Key usually give a very good idea of the remedy’s genius.

This general quality of the patient and of the remedy has also been called, by various authors in homoeopathy, the essence, keynote, soul, red line, or the grand generals. Examples of the Genius can include: Baryta carbonicum – slow development, torpid, dwarfish, early senility, scropula, vascular softening, takes cold easily, slow, inept and backward. Stannum – extreme weakness, paralytic heaviness, profuse mucus secretions Cuprum – intermittent, spasms, cramps, jerking, violence, nerves affected The sides of the triangle, Symptoms and System, complement each other, and when they are used together, the best results ensue. Symptoms include the use of rubrics, structured repertorization, keynotes, provings, characteristics, and clinical symptoms. The System includes kingdom, sensation and miasm. When the System areas are used synergistically and in complete unison with traditional methods of analysis, the view of the case and of the remedy is widened.

This allows for the greatest understanding of what is to be cured in disease, and what is curative in a remedy. ‘Synergy’ is the idea of everything coming together.

When many things come together, the result is greater than the sum of those parts. Whether you first pick up the match box and bring it to the match stick, or you first pick up the match stick and bring it to the match box, it does not make a difference. When the two come together the fire is lit. For example, symptomatically a person may have a certain neurotic state which started after the death of his friend.

One could consider the rubric: ʻAilments from death of parents / friends,ʼ and get Ignatia, Nux vomica, Kali bromatum, Natrum muriaticum and several other remedies. That is one way. But if we ask the patient about their experience, they might say that it is like a sudden shock, a surprise, a feeling that they want to avoid. Then the fire is lit, because you see the Loganiaceae sensation (shock, surprise) coming together with the sycotic miasm (wanting to avoid), and a rubric that contains two other Loganiaceae plants (ʻAilments from death of parents / friendsʼ) and you know for sure that the remedy must be Gelsemium. When we see the point where right hemisphere and left hemisphere come together, suddenly there is a realization that the remedy has to be this. It is not merely this data added to that data, but the entire understanding of the system on one side and the symptoms on the other side, that creates a big impact.

Sankaran, you had some of the finest classical homeopaths as your teachers and mentors. Still you explored more contemporary approaches towards dreams, core-delusion, sensation, kingdom-classification etc. What led you to these new developments? And do these new developments take one away from the classical roots?

RS: The contemporary and the conventional are mutually complementary and need to be studied together. In I had emphasized that. Here is a quote from that interview: “Initially I too felt this dilemma. I felt that it could be risky to expose new comers to the new ideas before they learnt what has been traditionally taught. But I now feel differently.

I believe that both complement one another, and so they can be taught in parallel. The old and the new are not different from each other.

The new concepts have as their fundamental base, the traditional knowledge of the philosophy, of provings, the Materia medica and rubrics. The system of kingdoms is only a systematization of the knowledge of the remedies and is derived from a study of the Materia medica and the rubrics. Without those foundations, the system cannot be stable; it hangs loosely in the air. And, on the other side, without a map of the system, the Materia medica becomes cumbersome and fragmented.

Both need each other.” My view has only been more strenghthened over the years. And has crystallized into an approach that seamlessly blends the old and new together in a harmonious and synergistic connection as I have explained in the answer to your first question. MB: While reading your book (The Synergy in Homeopathy), it appears that there has been a shift in the way you practice or approach cases now. I have seen others commenting (after reading your book) on Facebook that your approach has now become more classical (whatever that word means!).

Do you see this as a platonic (sudden, transient) shift or a tectonic (slow, long-lasting) shift? RS: I see it as an evolution, a natural progression.

The sensation idea is that when we explore a persons symptom (mental or physical) to a deeper level, we will see at the core an experience: a sensation. This sensation speaks the language of nature, of mineral, plant or animal and recognizing this experience can make it easier to come to the remedy. This was a new tool, and it was exciting; it gave us results in some very difficult cases. And the idea was very appealing. Like any new discovery, any new invention, any new instrument we do tend to initially use it too much.

We want all cases to be solved by that way only. And we do want to use it exclusively. But once we are over the initial excitement, we are able to put the new instrument in its proper place, and use it along with the others that we were using earlier.

It becomes integrated and not exclusive. In my own practice, the conventional tools such as Repertory and Materia Medica have always been at the foundation. My entire system of the kingdoms is based on the symptoms from the materia medica. So, I never lost that basis (it is like my mother tongue).

Now I have come a full circle and in my own practice there is a harmonious, energizing integration between the conventional and the conteporary. Roc C All Questions Answered Rare. I let the patient decide what approach suits him best, and also am able to see that different approaches bring us to the same point often and this makes our remedy selection that much more sure and effective.