Install Phoenix Miner Windows Defender

Posted on

It might seem like your computer has no programs open, but there may still be some running in the background. Your gaming mouse, graphics card, or browser might have software that starts running as soon as you boot up your computer. These are called background applications (apps) or programs, and they aren’t always visible on your taskbar when they’re running. Every application that’s running on your computer uses up some of its resources (processing power, memory, etc.). Your computer can slow down if you have a lot of apps running at the same time.

This can result in slow framerates or laggy gameplay, and it can lead to more serious issues like limited connectivity or game crashes. If your games are running slowly or have lag, try closing as many background apps as you can before launching Origin or your game to help improve your gaming. If a program seems to be causing problems with your games or Origin, you can: • Close or disable the program(s) • Add Origin and your games individually as exceptions to your security applications so that they can run together at the same time with fewer problems. • Exceptions can also be called 'safe' or 'allowed.' To add Origin and your games as exceptions: The steps to add exceptions can vary, depending on the security software you use. Check with the manufacturer of your firewall and anti-virus programs to see how to add Origin as an exception.

• Find Origin.exe in C: Program Files (x86) Origin. If you installed Origin in another folder on your computer, look there instead. • Add OriginClientService. Cahn C 31 Microbalance Manual more. exe, also found in this folder, to your exceptions, too.

• To add a specific game as an exception, go to C: Program Files (x86) Origin Games 'Game Name'. • Find the game’s.exe file, which is usually either the game's full title or an abbreviated version.

If you've had issues booting up your games or using the Origin client itself, make sure to fully close these or similar kinds of programs: Anti-virus applications Anti-virus programs, like McAfee or AVG, can sometimes block game access. Add Origin and your games as exceptions to your anti-virus. If you keep having trouble, disable or temporarily uninstall the anti-virus to help pin down the cause. Premante Idera Mp3 Ringtones Free Download. Anti-spyware Programs Just like anti-virus programs, anti-spyware applications, like Ad Aware and Spybot Search and Destroy, can mistakenly block Origin or your games while trying to protect your computer.

Add Origin and your games as exceptions to your anti-spyware. If you keep having trouble, disable or temporarily uninstall the anti-spyware to troubleshoot. Firewall and other security applications Firewalls and any other security measures you have on your computer, like Windows Defender and Peerblock, try their best to keep only the most important information coming through to your computer. This can cause interference when running the Origin client or your games. Add Origin and your games as exceptions to your firewalls. If you keep having trouble, disable or temporarily uninstall your firewall to troubleshoot.

Peer to Peer applications Peer to Peer (P2P) programs, like uTorrent and Limewire, can use up both your net-bandwidth and your computer’s processing power, especially if you’re downloading lots of things simultaneously. Close out any P2P apps or limit the number of active downloads/uploads while playing your games or using Origin. If you’re on a shared network, check that no one else is torrenting while you’re playing, too.

FTP and other web server programs Much like P2P software, FTP or other Web Server programs, like Cyberduck and Filezilla, can eat up a lot of your Internet bandwidth. This affects your online play and can take up a lot of your system's resources, which can cause slowed-down or laggy gameplay.

Install Phoenix Miner Windows Defender

Exit any FTP or similar program completely before playing, or make sure that no downloads or uploads are active. Download management applications Download management programs, like Internet Download Manager or Download Accelerator Plus, may affect your game downloads or updates. Before opening Origin, close out your Download Management software. Virtual Private Network applications Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) give users access to private networks, like business intranets. VPNs take up extra Internet connection bandwidth as well as computer processing power.

Private networks may also have extra security measures that can limit game playability. Disconnect from any VPN you're connected to before starting up your game.

Proxy, IP Filtering, and IP Masking Programs Using a proxy, IP filtering, or IP masking software can affect how your computer and your games are connecting to Origin and EA's game servers. Disable these before jumping into the Origin client and your games. The use of proxy servers is not supported by the Origin client. Programs that have visual overlays Any program that tries to place a filter, picture, or Graphical User Interface (GUI) on top of a running program can cause problems for Origin and your games. Origin has its own In-Game Overlay feature, so multiple running at one time can cause issues. VoIP programs, like Ventrilo or Mumble and game progress monitors, like Raptr, have these kinds of overlays. Close these programs or disable their overlay before running Origin or your games.

This is not a full list of everything that could affect your gaming experience. If you’re running a program that you're unsure how to classify, disable, close, uninstall, or troubleshoot, search the web to learn all you can about what is active and running on your PC. If you keep having problems after closing these programs, find which is the most active or processing intensive programs, then try closing or uninstalling the program, restarting your computer, and seeing if there is any improvement.

Check out these articles: • • • • Was this article helpful? 9% of 1045 players found this article helpful. Related Content • • • •.

Despite all the attention currently focused on Windows computers being infected with ransomware, a defensive strategy has been overlooked. This being a Defensive Computing blog, I feel the need to point it out. The story being told everywhere else is simplistic and incomplete. Basically, the story is that Windows computers without the are getting infected over the network by WannaCry ransomware and the Adylkuzz cryptocurrency miner. We are accustomed to this story. Bugs in software need patches. WannaCry exploits a bug in Windows, so we need to install the patch.

For a couple days, I too, ascribed to this knee-jerk theme. But there is a gap in this simplistic take on the issue. Let me explain. The bug has to do with input data being processed incorrectly. Specifically, if a Windows computer, that supports version 1 of the (SMB), is listening on the network, bad guys can send it specially crafted malicious data packets that an un-patched copy of Windows does not handle correctly. This mistake allows bad guys to run a program of their choosing on the computer. As security flaws go, this is as bad as it gets.

RadarSync Driver Alert Service, Driver Navigator, Windows Driver Updater. Install Phoenix Miner Linux. Windows Defender detects and removes this threat. May 08, 2012 I was able to update Windows Defender. I ran a full scan and of course it found 3 viruses and 1 cryptocurrency miner. The 'Install Windows.

If one computer in an organization gets infected, the malware can propagate itself to vulnerable computers on the same network. There are three versions of the SMB file sharing protocol, numbered 1, 2 and 3. The bug only comes into play with version 1. Version 2 was introduced with Vista, Windows XP only supports version 1.

Judging by assorted articles from Microsoft, it is probably enabled by default on current versions of Windows. Overlooked is that every Windows computer that uses version 1 of the SMB protocol does not have to accept unsolicited incoming packets of data. And those that don't, are safe from network based infection. Not only are they protected from WannaCry and Adylkuzz, but also from any.

If unsolicited incoming SMB v1 data packets are not processed, the Windows computer is safe from network based attack - patch or no patch. The patch is a good thing, but it's not the only defense. To make an analogy, consider a castle. The bug is that the wooden front door of the castle is weak and easily broken down with a battering ram. The patch hardens the front door. But, this ignores the moat outside the castle walls.

If the moat is drained, the weak front door is indeed a big problem. But, if the moat is filled with water and alligators, then the enemy can't get to the front door in the first place.

The Windows firewall is the moat. All we need to do is block TCP port 445. Like Rodney Dangerfield, the Windows firewall gets no respect. GOING AGAINST THE GRAIN It is quite disappointing that no one else has suggested the Windows firewall as a defensive tactic. That the mainstream media gets things wrong when it comes to computers is old news.

I blogged about this back in March (). When much of the advice offered by the New York Times, in, comes from a marketing person for a VPN company it fits a pattern. Many computer articles in the Times are written by someone without a technical background. The advice in that article could have been written in the 1990s: update software, install an antivirus program, be wary of suspicious emails and pop-ups, yada yada yada. But even technical sources covering WannaCry, said nothing about the Windows firewall.

For example, the National Cyber Security Centre in England: install the patch, run antivirus software and make file backups. Ars Technica, the whole patch and nothing but the patch. A devoted solely to defense said to install the patch, update Windows Defender and turn off SMB version 1. Steve Gibson devoted the of his podcast to WannaCry and never mentioned a firewall. Using their antivirus software (of course), installing the patch and making file backups.

Even Microsoft neglected their own firewall. Phillip Misner's says nothing about a firewall. A few day later, Anshuman Mansingh's suggested installing the patch, running Windows Defender and blocking SMB version 1. TESTING WINDOWS XP Since I seem to be the only person to suggest a firewall defense, it occurred to me that perhaps blocking the SMB file sharing ports interferes with sharing files. So, I ran a test. The most vulnerable computers run Windows XP.

Version 1 of the SMB protocol is all XP knows. Vista and later versions of Windows can do file sharing with version 2 and/or version 3 of the protocol. By all accounts, WannaCry spreads using TCP port 445. A port is somewhat analogous to an apartment in an apartment building. The address of the building corresponds an IP address. Communication on the Internet between computers may appear to be between IP addresses/buildings, but it is actually between apartments/ports.

Some specific apartments/ports are used for dedicated purposes. This website, because it's not secure, lives at apartment/port 80.

Secure websites live at apartment/port 443. Some articles also mentioned that ports 137 and 139 play a part in Windows file and printer sharing. Rather than pick and chose ports, I tested under the harshest conditions: all ports were blocked. To be clear, firewalls can block data traveling in either direction.

As a rule, the firewall on a computer, and in a router, only blocks unsolicited incoming data. To anyone interested in Defensive Computing, blocking unsolicited incoming packets is standard operating procedure. The default configuration, which can be modified of course, is to allow everything outbound. My test XP machine was doing just that. The firewall was blocking all unsolicited incoming data packets (in XP lingo, it was not allowing any exceptions) and allowing anything that wanted to leave the machine to do so. The XP machine shared a network with a Network Attached Storage (NAS) device that was doing its normal job, sharing files and folders on the LAN.

I verified that cranking up the firewall to its most defensive setting did not hinder file sharing. The XP machine was able to read and write files on the NAS drive. The patch from Microsoft lets Windows safely expose port 445 to unsolicited input. But, for many, if not most Windows machines, there is no need to expose port 445 at all. I am no expert on Windows file sharing, but it is likely that the only Windows machines that need the WannaCry/WannaCrypt patch are those functioning as file servers. Windows XP machines that don't do file sharing, can further be protected by disabling that feature in the operating system. Specifically, disable four services: Computer Browser, TCP/IP NetBIOS Helper, Server and Workstation.

To do so, go to the Control Panel, then Administrative Tools, then Services while logged on as an Administrator. And, if that's still not enough protection, get the properties of the network connection and turn off the check-boxes for 'File and Printer Sharing for Microsoft Networks' and 'Client for Microsoft Networks.' CONFIRMATION A pessimist might argue that without access to the malware itself, I can't be 100% sure that blocking port 445 is a sufficient defense. But, while writing this article, there was third party confirmation.

Security company Proofpoint,, Adylkuzz, with an interesting side effect. We discovered another very large-scale attack using both EternalBlue and DoublePulsar to install the cryptocurrency miner Adylkuzz. Initial statistics suggest that this attack may be larger in scale than WannaCry: because this attack shuts down SMB networking to prevent further infections with other malware (including the WannaCry worm) via that same vulnerability, it may have in fact limited the spread of last week’s WannaCry infection. In other words, Adylkuzz after it infected a Windows computer, and this blocked the computer from being infected by WannaCry., writing 'Since Adylkuzz only attacks older, unpatched versions of Windows, all you need to do is install the latest security updates.' The familiar theme, yet again. Finally, to put this in perspective, LAN based infection may have been the most common way machines were infected by WannaCry and Adylkuzz, but it is not the only way.

Defending the network with a firewall, does nothing against other types of attacks, such as malicious email messages. FEEDBACK Get in touch with me privately by email at my full name at Gmail or publicly on twitter at @defensivecomput.